The ICC has corrected Virat Kohli’s tally of days spent as the No.1 batter in the ICC Men’s ODI batting rankings, after an earlier official figure created confusion over his place in the all-time list.
Kohli returned to the top spot in the latest ODI rankings update following his match-winning 93 off 91 balls against New Zealand in Vadodara, ending a spell away from the summit that had lasted since July 2021. In the initial ICC communication around that update, Kohli was credited with 825 days at No.1 — a number that was also reflected in the accompanying “most days at the top” chart shared alongside the rankings story.
The ICC has since amended that statistic and now states Kohli has spent 1,547 days as the No.1 ODI batter in total. The updated count makes Kohli the India batter with the most days at the top of the ODI rankings and places him third on the all-time list. Only West Indies great Viv Richards (2,306 days) and Brian Lara (2,079 days) have spent more time as the No.1 ODI batter.
Also Read: Sanjay Manjrekar sells Virat Kohli's genius short: Are ODIs really easy?
The correction significantly reshapes Virat Kohli’s historical standing. With the 825-day figure, he was shown outside the top tier despite his repeated returns to No.1 across different eras of ODI cricket. With the revised tally of 1,547, Kohli moves ahead of several modern greats and sits behind only Richards and Lara on the longevity chart — a more accurate reflection of multiple spells at the top rather than one isolated stint.
The update also highlights how a small numerical error can quickly alter the narrative in the rankings era, where “days at No.1” has become a shorthand measure for sustained dominance. For Kohli, that number now underlines not just peak brilliance but the rare durability required to return to the summit again and again, across changing conditions, formats and opposition cycles.
While the ICC has not publicly explained why the earlier figure was published, such discrepancies typically arise when different counting methods are used across graphics and editorial copy, or when an older data pull is carried into a new visual package. The corrected figure indicates the ICC is now applying a cumulative total across Kohli’s various stints at No.1.
Kohli first reached No.1 in October 2013 and has reclaimed the spot 10 times since, reinforcing his long-term status as one of ODI cricket’s defining batters. With the correction now issued, the focus will be on ensuring all ICC-facing tables and graphics reflect .
On January 16, 2026, the ICC issued a significant correction regarding Virat Kohli’s historical standing in the ODI rankings.
After fans and statisticians flagged the discrepancy, the ICC confirmed that Kohli has spent a cumulative 1,547 days at the top spot, placing him among the absolute elite in cricket history.
📊 The All-Time "Days at No. 1" List (ODI)
With this correction, Kohli has moved from 10th place to 3rd place on the all-time list for the most days spent as the world's top-ranked ODI batter.
| Rank | Player | Total Days at No. 1 |
| 1 | Sir Vivian Richards | 2,306 days |
| 2 | Brian Lara | 2,079 days |
| 3 | Virat Kohli | 1,547 days |
| 4 | Dean Jones | 1,146 days |
🔍 How the Error Happened
The confusion began on January 14, 2026, when Kohli reclaimed the No. 1 spot after a match-winning 93 off 91 balls against New Zealand in Vadodara.
The Glaring Error: The ICC’s initial social media graphic credited Kohli with only 825 days at the top.
7 This figure seemingly only accounted for a single stint rather than his cumulative career total.8 The Correction: After intense backlash from fans and data experts, the ICC deleted the post and updated the figure to 1,547 days.
9 This includes his massive 1,258-day continuous reign between 2017 and 2021, plus his various other spells starting from October 2013.10
🏆 Why This Matters
This correction cements Kohli as the most dominant Indian batter in ODI ranking history.
Would you like to see a breakdown of Virat Kohli’s current ICC rating points compared to the rest of the Top 5?
No comments:
Post a Comment